Hamburg GenealogyI have not delved into Edgefield District genealogy to any great extent, and
you can learn a lot more than I know by going to Cyndi's List.
You can address queries to the very active Old Edgefield District Genealogical Society, with many books and activites listed
on their website at oedgs.org, or their excellent Tompkins
Library at 104 Courthouse Square, Edgefield SC 29824, 803-637-4010. Note that the present Edgefield County is quite a bit
smaller than the Old Edgefield District. Hamburg is now in Aiken County, which was formed in 1871.
So you might also contact the Aiken-Barnwell Genealogical Society with website at
www.abgs.org, which for example has published several books on
Aiken cemeteries.
One terrific site allows searching by name or location through official State manuscripts: the
South Carolina Department of Archives and History.
Names can appear on petitions to the State, which were frequent in this period, and in any other matter
that required the attention of the Legislature or a State official. For example, this
list of petitioners
was found searching All Databases under Individual "Whitner". In the particular case of Hamburg, the State
was occasionally called upon to intervene in disputes over land ownership. Reproductions by mail of any
hits you may get are pricy, but a lot less than a plane trip.
In the meantime, below are posted unusual and interesting documents full of
local names for your use.
Edgefield County Loose PapersCollection under supervision of Tricia Price GlennIn 2003 old records squirrelled away in various Departments were swept up and brought to the Edgefield
County Archives. Rough sorting of these papers by Daughter of the South Betsy Bloomer is in progress, with perhaps
10 cubic feet sorted into folders by name, including a 4 inch stack connected with Henry Shultz or the Town of Hamburg.
Loose papers are frequently filed during the course of lawsuits, and that appears to be the cause for the great majority of the Shultz portion of the collection. It is not at all random, rather it's focussed on certain points. In particular, the 1830-1835 Stoney & Magrath vs Shultz lawsuit haggles over the ownership and value of Upper Hamburg, which is the 398 acre Walter Leigh tract purchased by Shultz in 1823. This alone accounts for possibly 80% of the Shultz papers. These include conveyances which are largely duplicated in Edgefield County Deed Books 38-42. They also include legal motions and discussions of lot ownership and value. Finally, Upper Hamburg was in the hands of trustees during the course of this case, and their Reports of Rents and Disbursements are new and unusual. A further 10% of these papers are claims against the bankrupt Shultz, mostly submitted in response to a notice by James Terry, Commissioner in Equity for Edgefield District. The last 10% is the W. B. Brannon Journal, which is completely unrelated to the lawsuits and is a running record of an 1850 Hamburg warehousing and shipping business. The last ½% are miscellaneous. The following is a selection of abstracts I have made from this collection with the aid and permission of Tricia Price Glenn at the Edgefield County Archives. Many thanks are due to Tricia Glenn and Betsy Bloomer for their work in exposing these documents. 28 Jun 1824 Statement of Value of Work by the late John Kumbell, Carpenter We the undersigned by request of Henry Shultz Esq of Hamburgh having examined the work finished and unfinished by the late John Kumbell Carpenter for said Mr. Shultz give the following as a fair valuation of the work done:'
28th June 1824 Hamburg, SC (s) James Miller, Edward Henderson 12 Jul 1824 IOU On demand I promise to pay A. H. Pemberton or bearer Forty five dollars 43 ¾ for Value Received (s) Henry Shultz A. H. Pemberton was publisher of the _Augusta Chronicle_.
11 Jun 1832 Statement by John Sharp Personally appeared before me John Sharp… and saith, that he is the holder and sole proprietor of a certain Note of hand drawn by Henry Shult and made payable to A. H. Pemberton or bearer for the sum of Forty five dollars and forty three and three quarter cents, dated 12th July 1824…’ Shultz was said to have owed money to every person he met.
18 Jun 1828 Statement by Whit. Brooks to Show Cause for refusal to pay Henry Shultz $2015 //John // Williamson // vs.// Henry Shultz vs. the Legatees of Walter Leigh In answer to the rule, to shew cause in the case why I have refused to pay over to the plaintiff the sum of $2015, claimed as money belonging to Henry Shultz; I submit the following statement of facts. The money arose from the sale of a tract of land devised by Walter Leigh to his brothers and sisters then surviving & to the children of those, who were dead, of whom there were nine in number. The land was sold by order of the court for partition among the devisees & purchased by Henry Shultz, who executed a bond & mortgage to secure the payment of the purchase money. Henry Shultz claimed the share of James Hix one of the devisees & presented to me satisfactory proof, that he was entitled to draw the share to which he was entitled. In this state of the case while this purchase money {} unpaid, Henry Shultz drew on me the following orders, one in favor of Danl Bird for four hundred forty one dollars 43%, dated 4 June 1826. One other in favor of Mr. Thurmond for $695. dated June 15 1826. One other in favor of Jos Godwin for 339.65 dated 27 June 1826. One other in favor of Francis Clark for 270. dated 30 May 1826 and also to myself for $300 on account of fees of office due to me by the said Henry Shultz.. All of which orders I accepted at the time of their respective dates. Henry Shultz having failed to pay the purchase money, an order for foreclosure and sale was obtained in the Court of Common Pleas and the land sold by the Shff of this District on the first Monday in December last… Shultz did buy one ninth part of the Walter Leigh tract from James
Hicks. Evidently Shultz claimed and obtained a credit on this share from Whitfield Brooks,
Commissioner in Equity for Edgefield District, after buying the entire tract at Sheriff’s sale.
This credit came into question when Shultz failed to make good on the larger deal. Shultz filed
petitions under the Insolvent Debtors act in March and October 1828 (Edgefield District
Miscellaneous Index 1812-1850)
Nov 1832 Statements by Henry Mayson and Thos. A. Cobb Personally appeared before me Henry H. Mayson, who being duly
sworn saith that he has been for the last month and half in the employment of
Hugh Moore of the Town of Hamburg as a clerk – That on the 13th of
November inst. He locked the Store House doors of the said H. Morse (he the
said Moore being from home) & went out on business carrying with him the
Keys, was absent a few hours, and on his return found the Back door of the House
open & the lock off, and in the House appeared David Cobb and James Cobb
Junr. whom he is of the opinion forced upon the door & possessed themselves
of the premises, & that some short time after this deponent’s return, James
Cobb Senr. came into the House saying he had possession of the House & that
he intended to keep it, that it was his property – The Store was held by lease
from Thos. Harrison & Ker Boyce Trustees of the Estate of Henry Shultz,
the above named David Cobb and James Cobb Junr. are sons of James Cobb Senr.
who claims the premises – The said David Cobb was armed with a large Pistol
– Personally came before me Thos. A. Cobb who being duly sworn,
saith that about the first of November inst. He received from H. Moore of the
Town of Hamburg a power of attorney to take charge of the goods in his Store
in said town, that – on the 13th of November inst. He was informed
that a forcible entry had been made into the Store of said Moore, that he went
to the Store and found there David Cobb, armed with a large Pistol, (the old
Locks had been taken off and new ones put on) he informed the said D. Cobb,
that he had charge of the goods and showed him his power of attorney from the
said Moore, & was answered in reply by the said David Cobb, that the property
was his Fathers and that if he moved an article he would blow daylight through
him, presenting at the same time his Pistol at this deponent – James Cobb Senr.
then came in and swore that the property was his and that he would have it at
all hazards. James Cobb Junr. also came into the House with a Pistol in his
hand but said nothing, but this deponent is of opinion that he came then determined
to use his arms if any necessity appeared, or that his assistance would be required
in retaining the House. 17 Apr 1834 Statement of Ownership for Lot 232 in Town of Hamburg Personally came Laurance Brock and makes oath that Henry Shultz made a title to Henry Brock of Lot No 232 in the plan of the Town of Hamburg, the date of which deed is not recollected and as this deponent believes said deed is {} in the Clerks Office at Edgefield, or in the hands of David L. Addams of Savannah. Statements of Rents and Disbursements described below do show
H. Brock or H. & L. Brock as owners of Lot 232.
Undated, ca. 1833 An Apportionment of Rents between the Several Lot Holders and the Mortgager Marked ‘S’. I suppose 'No of Lots' refers to the lot numbers as found on the 1835 plat.
Further columns in this table are Rent of Ground, Rent of Improvements, Rent due Lot owner. These latter columns
are haggled with corrections.
There are many examples along the lines of the above, curiously they are
generally undated.
Undated, ca. 1833 Account of Rents Right hand 1/3 of this page is gone. It undoubtedly covers the same
properties as in the list above but instead of listing the owners, it lists the rent
payers (and presumably the residents).
‘An Account of Rents of Upper Hamburgh< be Collected by Thomas Harrison one of the Trust< Shultz under the Order and decree of the Court of Equ<’
List of Account Numbers in W B Brannon Journal For once something not part of a Henry Shultz lawsuit.
This is an accounting journal, labelled W. B. Brannon Journal
on the spine, with 256 pages of transactions from September 1849 to July 1852
all in Hamburg. This seems to be a warehousing and shipping business, and as
such would have business with area farmers and merchants storing cotton, and
with anyone importing or exporting goods through the Town of Hamburg.
Transactions are reported by account for each month, beginning
on Page 1 dated Sept 1849. Number 25 is the first account that appears in this
book. New accounts appear regularly. Due to the ornate handwriting, I have
probably misread a number of single initials. I would expect many if not most
accounts are from out of town. The business seems to have folded by September 1851.
List of LettersREMAINING in the Post Office at Hamburg, S.C., on the 21st day of March, 1840.
Persons enquiring for any of these letters will say that they are advertised. J. W. YARBOROUGH, P. M. As reported in the Hamburg Journal, 9 May 1840 p3c6. These lists of
unclaimed letters at the Hamburg Post Office are commonly found in the Edgefield Advertiser as well.
The Advertiser from 1836 to date is on microfilm at the Tompkins Library in Edgefield, and the
South Caroliniana Library in Columbia.
Edgefield District Minutes of General Sessions 1826-1837Spring Session, 1829 The State vs Josiah Lanham {{ Assault with intent to murder The Sentence of the Court is that you be imprisoned two weeks and pay a fine of Ten Dollars & Cost. The State vs Joseph I Kennedy, Briston Charles, John Kimbrell et al {{ Riot & Assault It appearing to the Court on affidavit, that the defendants above named have given in Sufficient Security ordered on motion of the Solicitor that the clerk do cause them by warrant to be brought before him and enter into recognizance with other and better security for their appearance at the next term. The State in the matter of Henry Shultz {{ On the affidavit of Henry Shultz read in open Court and on motion of the Solicitor ordered that the clerk issue his warrent and cause Robert McDonald, Lester Richards, James Tatom, John Sale, Thomas A. Cobb and Alex'd Boyd to be brought before him, and enter into recognizance to keep the peace towards all persons, and especially towards Henry Shultz themselves each in the sum of Five Hundred dollars with one or more good Securities in the like sum. Spring Session, 1830 Sentences State vs James Tatom, John Sale, Alexander Boyd, Jos. J. Kennedy, Wm. N. Bernard, Thomas A. Cobb, Bristow Charters, John Kimbrell, John L. Pamphlin, Lester Richards, & Robert McDonald {{ Indict Riot & Assault & Battery The Sentence of the court is that John Sale be imprisoned two weeks and pay a fine of thirty dollars, Thomas A. Cobb be imprisoned two weeks and pay a fine of thirty dollars, & Alexander Boyd, Jos. J. Kennedy, William N. Bernard, John Kimbrell, John S. Pamphlin and James Tatom be imprisoned five days each. Lester Richards and Robert McDonald appealed. The impulse for this riot was most likely Shultz's behavior towards tenants and lot holders in the Leigh tract as described in a Bill of Complaint against him by John Stoney and John Magrath on 8 Oct 1830: H. Shultz asserts that the legal estate is still in him, has ejected some of the tenants, demands rent from all, and threatens and disturbs them with vexations, proceedings, by actions, distress warrants etc.... The bill prays, that the said H. Shultz may be injoined from entering upon the premises held by your orators or their tenants for the purpose of distraining upon the tenants or putting them out of possession; and also from suing your orators or their tenants at law for the recovery of rent or possession of the land, and from prosecuting any action at law now pending for the recovery of rent or the possession of the land. James Tatom despised Henry Shultz, for example he was reported to have said "If Henry Shultz was in the river drowning, I would not throw him a plank." On another occasion, Tatom was asked to lend some of his cups, and Tatom refused saying, "If Shultz drank out of one of them, it should never come again into this house." Alexander Boyd was involved with Shultz in the Joseph Martin manslaughter incident. Despite the brevity of these minutes, it's fascinating to scan the steady heartbeat of Spring and Fall Terms with their judgements on the offenses of the day including Playing at Faro Bank, Trading with a Slave, Retailing Spiritous Liquors, Murder, Hog Stealing, Assault, Nuisance, Bastardy, Forgery, and Stealing Slaves, which latter appears to be the only capital offense. In addition to adjudicators and offenders, complete lists of jurors are given, including the pool to be summoned for the next term, jurors that appeared in response to summons for the present term, and those actually drawn to serve on a Grand or Petit jury. |